Coughlin Construction Co. v. Nu-Tec Industries, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Nu-Tec Industries, Inc. (“Nu-Tec”), Ronald J. Balzer, Rudy Balzer, and James Balzer appeal from a judgment and amended judgment awarding Coughlin Construction Company, Inc. (“Coughlin”), $151,122 in damages, costs, and fees for breach of a construction contract. They also appeal from an order denying their motion for amended findings. We conclude the district court’s award of damages *870is not clearly erroneous and the court did not err in piercing the corporate veil of Nu-Tec. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On May 6, 2002, Coughlin, as the general contractor, entered into a contract…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Fontana v. TLD Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. NoackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Hilzendager v. SkwarokNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Armstrong v. Clarkson CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Monster Heavy Haulers, LLC v. Goliath Energy Services, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. ChristianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Macquarie Bank Limited v. Bradley D. KnickelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.