Kansas Jack, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Charles J. Kuhn and Kuhn Manufacturing Company, Inc., Appellees/cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Appeal from a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California holding that claims 1, 2, and 11 of U.S. Patent 3,566,667 (Hagerty patent) are invalid, and that William K. Hagerty (Hagerty) did not commit fraud on the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Hagerty patent, for which the application was filed on October 28, 1968, and which issued on March 2,1971, discloses and claims a vehicle frame straightening device, best illustrated in Fig. 1:
*1147[[Image here]]
Chain 30, one end of which is connected to the frame to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Chore-Time Equipment, Inc. v. Cumberland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re Howard SernakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.