Legal Opinion

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. Rummel Klepper & Kahl, LLP

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 21, 2017No. 14/16PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this appeal we revisit the elusive economic loss doctrine, to decide whether to extend a duty in tort to persons not in privity for the recovery of purely economic losses. Petitioner, a general contractor who successfully bid for work on a City of Baltimore construction project, argues that Respondent, the project’s design engineering firm, owes it a tort duty of care because Respondent knew that Petitioner would rely on its designs in bidding and constructing the project. We shall hold, that, in the absence of contractual privity, physical injury, ox-risk of physical injury, design…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Powell v. Md. Dep't of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Barclay v. CastruccioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Powell v. Maryland Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC v. Ground Zero Field Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  5. Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC v. Ground Zero Field Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API