Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Gilbert
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 2012No. 1381 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) petitions for review of an order of the Office of Open Records (OOR) dated June 27, 2011, which determined that the records requested from the PUC by Daniel Gilbert, a reporter for The Wall Street Journal (Gilbert), are “public records,” pursuant to the Righb-to-Know Law (Law), 1 and directed the PUC to make these records available. We reverse.
On March 31, 2011, the PUC received a written request from Gilbert pursuant to the Law, seeking access to records related to underground natural gas pipelines. Gilbert…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Department of Health v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Stein v. Plymouth TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Department of Transportation v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
3Cited by15 opinions
- Heavens v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- PA OAG v. B. Bumsted, Capitol Reporter Pittsburgh Tribune-ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. SederCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- W. McKelvey, PennLive, and The Patriot News v. Office of Attorney GeneralCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Department of Environmental Protection v. Delaware Riverkeeper NetworkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.