Bowling v. Office of Open Records
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
1. Whether Final Determinations rendered by the OOR are entitled to a deferential standard of review, for *266which the scope of the court’s review is limited to the record of the OOR?
2. Whether the level of judicial review imposed by the Commonwealth Court, which shall be applied in future appeals of OOR Final Determinations, was proper when the standard and scope of review do not effectuate the statutory process set forth in the RTKL, do not comport with accepted…
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- SWB YANKEES LLC v. WintermantelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Office of the Governor v. ScolforoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Carey v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Heavens v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.