Legal Opinion

PA OAG v. B. Bumsted, Capitol Reporter Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 2016No. 2097 C.D. 2014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge DAN PELLEGRINI.

The Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General (OAG) petitions for review of a final determination of its designated Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)2 Appeals Officer (Appeals Officer)3 granting Brad Bumsted’s (Requestor)4 request under the RTKL for emails containing pornographic materials. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

I

In July 2014, Requestor, the State Capitol Reporter for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, submitted an email request' under the RTKL to the OAG seeking copies of “any emails or other documents on an internal [OAG] review of pornographic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heavens v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Easton Area School District v. BaxterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n v. ScolforoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Barkeyville Borough v. StearnsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. DOC v. B. FiorilloCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. In Re: Appeal of S. Melamed, The Philadelphia InquirerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. J. Credico v. OAGCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. NOONAN v. KANEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API