PA OAG v. B. Bumsted, Capitol Reporter Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge DAN PELLEGRINI.
The Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General (OAG) petitions for review of a final determination of its designated Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)2 Appeals Officer (Appeals Officer)3 granting Brad Bumsted’s (Requestor)4 request under the RTKL for emails containing pornographic materials. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
I
In July 2014, Requestor, the State Capitol Reporter for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, submitted an email request' under the RTKL to the OAG seeking copies of “any emails or other documents on an internal [OAG] review of pornographic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heavens v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Easton Area School District v. BaxterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n v. ScolforoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Barkeyville Borough v. StearnsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- DOC v. B. FiorilloCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In Re: Appeal of S. Melamed, The Philadelphia InquirerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- J. Credico v. OAGCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- NOONAN v. KANEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.