Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Direct Merchants Bank
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 21, 2002No. 3:02-cv-01187PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REMAINING ACTION TO SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT
WHELAN, District Judge.
On March 18, 2002 Plaintiff Ronda L. Acosta (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against Defendants Direct Merchant Bank and Does 1-25 (“Defendants”) in San Diego Superior Court. Plaintiff asserts claims for defamation and violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act, Consumer Credit Protection Act, Truth and Lending Act, and Federal Trade Commission Act. On May 20, 2002 Defendant Direct Merchant Bank (“DMB”) received a copy of the Complaint via United States mail. On June 14, 2002 DMB filed an Answer and a Cross…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mattel, Inc. v. BryantDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Boggs v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Foley v. Allied Interstate, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Berbig v. Sears Roebuck and Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Benjamin Hulett v. Aramark Campus, LLC; Roderique Steve Gerrior; Tim Lamb; Jamie Schaftary; Robin Stefanik; Solomon Safer; and Does 1 through 50, inclusiveDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.