Legal Opinion

Mattel, Inc. v. Bryant

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 4, 2005No. CV 04-9059 NM (RNBX)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF MATTEL, INC.’S MOTION TO REMAND AND CERTIFYING QUESTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW

MANELLA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 27, 2004, Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”), the world’s largest manufacturer and marketer of toys, dolls, games, and stuffed toys and animals, filed the instant Complaint against its former employee, Carter Bryant (“Bryant”), in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles. The Complaint fails to state the amount in controversy and asserts generically-phrased causes of action for: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) breach of…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Leys v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Campbell v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  3. Oakland County v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  4. Rynearson v. Motricity, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  5. Vandeventer v. GuimondDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API