Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Harris

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2016No. Civ. No. 16-971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Conti, Chief District Judge

I. Introduction

Pending before the court is a motion to remand filed by plaintiffs Roy Boggs and Annette Boggs (“plaintiffs”). (EOF No. 5.) On June 28,2016, Defendants Darwin Harris (“Harris”) and Gateway Tours, Inc. (“Getaway Tours”) (together “removing defendants”) removed this case to this court based upon diversity of citizenship, after the only nondiverse defendant in the state action was voluntarily dismissed. (EOF No. 1.)

*479Plaintiffs argue that the case should be remanded because removing defendants waived their right to remove, or, in the alternative,…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Foster v. Chesapeake Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. ARMSLIST LLC v. FACEBOOK, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. BROWN v. RITE AID CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. GRIFFIN v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. KOVALEV v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Kevin Steinke, et al. v. Aon Investments USA Inc. and Aksia LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API