Johnson v. Pugh
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
This appeal is from an interlocutory decretal o.rder of the Circuit Court, sitting in equity, sustaining the defendants’ demurrers to the bill. The term “demurrers” is used advisedly. Speaking generally, a demurrer is a single entity and if any one ground of the demurrer is well taken the demurrer is due to be sustained. McDonald et al. v. Pearson, 114 Ala. 630, 21 So. 534. However, the, statute recognizes the general demurrer “that there is no equity in the bill” as a separate entity from a demurrer on specific grounds. The general demurrer was re-established in lieu of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonald v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- McDuffie v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Edmondson v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Jeffersonian Publishing Co. v. HilliardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Maples v. Chinese Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Pate v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948