Legal Opinion

Tufts v. Mann

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1931No. Docket No. 855PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, J., pro tem.

This is an action to recover a secret profit realized and retained by the defendant from a sale of real property negotiated by himself and the plaintiff. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant takes this appeal.

It is the theory of the plaintiff that he and the defendant were engaged in a joint adventure in negotiating the sale of certain real property which he held under option, which sale resulted in the profits retained by the defendant and that he, the plaintiff, is entitled to recover one-half of such profits. Briefly the facts are these, as found by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Robinson v. Easton Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Tsurukawa v. Nikon Precision, Inc. (In Re Tsurukawa)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Faultersack v. Clintonville Sales Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ethan Dairy Products v. AustinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API