Legal Opinion
Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. Gidney
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 1, 1959No. 1626-59PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.
Two state banks have moved for a preliminary injunction to restrain the Comptroller of the Currency from issuing a certificate authorizing a national bank to open a branch office in Clinton Township, Michigan.
Plaintiffs are two Michigan banks; one has its principal place of business in Roseville, Michigan, and the other in Fraser, Michigan. Immediately adjacent to Roseville, and one mile from the eastern boundary of Fraser is the unincorporated township of Clinton. The Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit (hereinafter referred to as National) has applied to the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Webster Groves Trust Co. v. SaxonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- The Elmo Division of Drive-X Company, Inc. v. Paul Rand Dixon, the Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- State, Department of Highways v. CrosbyAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Bank of Dearborn v. SaxonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.