Legal Opinion

Boston Edison Company

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 15, 2021No. 20-529Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-529C (Filed: November 15, 2021) ) BOSTON EDISON COMPANY, et al., ) Motion by defendant-intervenor for ) summary judgment; effect of prior Plaintiff, ) decisions; accrual of claims; ripeness; ) reconsideration denied v. ) ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) ) HOLTEC PILGRIM, LLC, ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) Richard J. Conway, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. With him on the briefs were Frederick M. Lowther and Adam Proujansky, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, D.C., and Neven Rabadjija, Deputy General Counsel, Eversource…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API