Legal Opinion

Thuermer v. Village of Mishicot

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1980No. 77-739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This case comes before the court on a petition to review a decision of the court of appeals, affirming a decision and order of the circuit court for Mani-towoc county, quashing an alternative writ of mandamus which sought to compel the Village of Mishicot to reimburse Richard J. Thuermer for attorney’s fees and costs incurred by him in defending a taxpayer’s action.

The sole issue to be decided by this court is whether sec. 895.46(1), Stats. 1977, 1 mandates that a municipal judge be reimbursed for attorney’s fees and costs incurred while defending a taxpayer’s suit against him. We hold that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S. D. Realty Co. v. Sewerage Commission of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bablitch & Bablitch v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Murphy v. PaullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beane v. City of Sturgeon BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Schroeder, Gedlen, Riester & Moerke v. SchoessowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. School Board of the Pardeeville Area School District v. BomberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. PARDEEVILLE AREA SCHOOL DIST v. BomberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API