Legal Opinion

Beane v. City of Sturgeon Bay

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1983No. 82-1325PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issue presented is whether as a matter of law the City of Sturgeon Bay complied with its statutory responsibility under sec. 895.46(1) (a), Stats., 1 to provide legal counsel to defend plaintiffs-police officers when they were sued civilly in federal court. A second issue is whether equitable estoppel is available to the plaintiffs under the circumstances of this case.

On January 14, 1982, plaintiffs filed a four-count amended complaint against defendant-City of Sturgeon Bay seeking indemnification for legal expenses incurred in the defense of a civil rights action. In the amended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. Moebius Printing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kohlenberg v. American Plumbing Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bablitch & Bablitch v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Thoreson Food Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. GerhardsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Blocker Drilling Canada, Ltd. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bin-Rilla v. IsraelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Graham v. Sauk Prairie Police CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Harmon v. Christy Lumber, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API