Legal Opinion

Kimmer v. Murata of America, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 2006No. 4187PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

In this workers’ compensation action, Richard Kimmer sought benefits for an alleged work injury. Before filing his workers’ compensation claim and without notifying his employer-carrier (collectively Murata), Kimmer settled a third party claim for the liability policy limit. The single commissioner concluded Kimmer elected his remedy by failing to notify Murata, and his workers’ compensation claim was barred. The Appellate Panel adopted the single commissioner’s conclusion. Kimmer appealed to the circuit court, which reversed the Appellate Panel and awarded Kimmer total…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Broughton v. South of the BorderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Callahan v. Beaufort County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Levi v. Northern Anderson County EmsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API