Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1964No. 3508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

At the conclusion of this divorce proceeding the mother was awarded custody of the six-year-old female child of the parties while the father was awarded custody of the male children, ages seventeen and fifteen. The sole question on appeal is whether the award of $20 each week for the support of the female child was excessive. The testimony established that the father earned approximately $62 a week.

It is settled that a father has a legal duty to provide for his children and that the measure of that duty is the chil*922dren’s needs and the father’s financial ability to pay.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schneider v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Payton v. PaytonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Bell v. BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Butts v. ButtsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benvenuto v. BenvenutoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Erb v. JHFDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Russell v. RussellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API