Legal Opinion

E.R.B. v. J.H.F.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1985No. Nos. 83-1199, 83-1244PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Chief Judge:

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to trial by jury in a proceeding to establish parentage. We hold that the right to a jury trial does not attach in such an action.

In July 1981, Ms. B filed a petition on behalf of herself and her son to establish paternity and provide support, naming Mr. F as respondent. Mr. F made a timely demand for a jury trial in his answer. Ms. B then filed a motion to strike the request for a jury, which the trial court granted. Thereafter, the case was heard by the trial court on February 9 and…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. 1618 Twenty-First Street Tenants' Ass'n v. Phillips CollectionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Leichtman v. KoonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Kudon v. f.m.e. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Olevsky v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API