Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1963No. 3177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

The wife sued her husband for a limited divorce on the ground of cruelty and sought custody of, and support for, the two minor children of the parties. Following trial, the court entered an order denying the limited divorce but granted the wife custody of the children and directed the husband pay $250 a month for their support. Appellant contends that the court abused its discretion in arbitrarily fixing such an amount.

We have reviewed the stenographic transcript and while the amount of support for the children was a generous one, we cannot say it was an abuse of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Butts v. ButtsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Russell v. RussellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Russell v. RussellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Sheridan v. SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API