Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Schneider
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 13, 1944No. 8568PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Associate Justice.
Appellant is the divorced wife of the appellee. They have one son. She brings this action (1) on her own behalf, to compel appellee to reimburse her for money expended for support of their son within the past four and one-half years, and (2) as next friend of the son, to require appellee to provide for his future support. The court below entered a summary judgment denying all relief, from which this appeal is taken.
The record discloses that the father is a resident of and domiciled in the District of Columbia. The mother resides in a Maryland suburb of the District.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lesh v. LeshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1903
- Rapeer v. ColpoysCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Wedderburn v. WedderburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tasanilla Hopson v. Delores Palmer HopsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Mims v. MimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Benvenuto v. BenvenutoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cohen v. MarkelCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.