Legal Opinion
AOC International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 11, 1989No. Court 87-01-00122PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Judge:
In this action, plaintiffs AOC International (“AOC”), Fulet Electronic Industrial Co. (“Fulet”), Sampo Corporation (“Sampo”) and Tatung Company (“Tatung”) challenge the final results of the first administrative review by the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“ITA” or “Commerce”) covering importations of color television receivers (“CTVs”), except for video monitors, from Taiwan which are subject to an antidumping duty order. See 51 Fed.Reg. 46895 (December 29, 1986).
Plaintiffs are the manufacturers and exporters of the CTVs to the United States and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- LMI—La Metalli Industriale, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hebei New Donghua Amino Acid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Windmill International PTE., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Independent Radionic Workers of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.