Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Independent Radionic Workers of America v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 16, 1994No. Slip Op. 94-144, No. 86-12-01551PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This matter is before the court on three motions pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the agency record. The motions have been brought by (1) the Independent Radionic Workers of America, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Technical, Salaried and Machine Workers (AFL-CIO) and the Industrial Union Department (AFL-CIO) (collectively “the Unions”), (2) Zenith Electronics Corporation, and (3) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”). To facilitate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aramide Maatschappij V.o.F. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  2. Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  3. Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  4. Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  5. Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API