Legal Opinion

Karle v. Seder

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1950No. 31048PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an action to recover damages for constructive fraud in connection with the sale of partnership property.

The complaint alleged actual fraud on the part of the defendants, but the trial court, in its memorandum opinion, stated that the.proof had failed to show actual fraud and that constructive fraud only was involved in the case.

The case came on for trial before the court without a jury. In addition to the testimony of the parties and their witnesses, twenty-one papers and documents bearing upon the transaction, which is the subject matter of this action, were admitted in evidence. At…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Cantwell v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Wise Realty Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Westerbeck v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Jennings v. RickardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Farrell v. ScoreWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Frisell v. NewmanWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Holman v. CoieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Bovy v. Graham, Cohen & WampoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API