Legal Opinion
People v. Milczakowskyj
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 28, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was informed that an enhanced sentence could be imposed if he failed to appear for sentencing, and thus his waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that the enhanced sentence is unduly harsh and severe (see, People v Burnice, 272 AD2d 882, lv denied 95 NY2d 863; People v Miles, 268 AD2d 489, lv denied 95 NY2d 800). The contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence without affording him an opportunity to withdraw his plea is not preserved for our review…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BurniceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. MonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. TylerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. GambleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. GuginoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.