Legal Opinion
People v. Burnice
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention concerning the severity of the enhanced sentence imposed after defendant violated the conditions of his release pending sentencing does not survive defendant’s unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal (see, People v Miles, 268 AD2d 489; People v Perham, 263 AD2d 766, Iv denied 93 NY2d 1045; People v Lagas, 245 AD2d 1087, Iv denied 92 NY2d 855; People v Lee, 236 AD2d 213, Iv denied 89 NY2d 1037). In any event, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Burglary, 3rd…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. PerhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. LagasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. EspinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. MilczakowskyjAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. DucreayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. MeadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006