Legal Opinion

In Re Graham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1983No. 8219DC726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Petitioner argues that the trial judge erred as a matter of law in not terminating the respondent’s parental rights. Its argument is also adopted by the Guardian Ad Litem of the minor children. The only finding of fact excepted to in the order is actually a conclusion of law in which the trial judge states that grounds for termination of parental rights as set forth in G.S. 7A-289.32 do not exist. The remaining twenty-five findings of fact which detail the evidence presented at the hearing bear no exceptions. They are therefore deemed to be supported by competent evidence and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re APACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Matter of WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Matter of Adoption of CardoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Matter of BurneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. In re L.O.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Matter of HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. IN THE MATTER OF ARPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. In re K.R.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API