Legal Opinion

Matter of Wilkerson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 8114DC598PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Respondents’ primary contention is that the evidence was insufficient to support termination of parental rights pursuant to G.S. 7A-289.32(3), and that their motions to dismiss at the close of petitioner’s evidence and of all the evidence thus should have been allowed. We disagree, and thus affirm.

G.S. 7A-289.32(3) permits termination of parental rights upon a finding that:

The parent has willfully left the child in foster care for more than two consecutive years without showing to the satisfaction of the court that substantial progress has been made within two years in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Matter of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Ply-Marts, Inc. v. PhilemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Caswell Realty Associates I, L.P. v. Andrews Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. In re the Stewart ChildrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Onslow County v. MercerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Matter of HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API