Legal Opinion
Barclaysamerican Corp. v. Kane
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1984No. 84-1952PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
In this action, petitioners request that we issue a writ of mandamus or prohibition to vacate the trial court’s order directing petitioners to disclose various documents that the trial judge determined were not protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. We conclude that the petition for an extraordinary writ should be denied.
Petitioners are defendants in a civil suit in which plaintiffs have alleged “federal and state securities law violations, negligent misrepresentation, and general negligence.” Trial court opinion at 2. At trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Joseph P. Jenkins v. Honorable Zita L. Weinshienk, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Hughes A. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In re PapandreouCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- In Re Qwest Communications International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.