Howell v. Marto Electric
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} In this case, we are asked to consider the effect of an employer’s failure to provide notice of its decision regarding selection of health care providers, as required by New Mexico’s Workers’ Compensation scheme. Because the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) erred as a matter of law when he found that evidence that neither the employer nor the worker chose the first health care provider was sufficient to rebut the presumption raised by the employer’s failure to provide proper notice, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
{2} The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martinez v. New Mexico State Engineer OfficeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Grine v. Peabody Natural ResourcesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Albuquerque v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Madrid v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dewitt v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Ortiz v. Overland ExpressNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Romero v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Johnson v. Hoyt & Son Tree ServiceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- New Mexico Board of Licensure v. TurnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.