Legal Opinion
Scheyd v. Bezrucik
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1987No. 13299PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this case is whether a challenge to the constitutionality of our minority representation statute, General Statutes § 9-167a, comes within the jurisdictional confines of General Statutes, § 9-328,1 which, under narrowly *497defined circumstances, provides expedited judicial procedures for the resolution of election disputes. The *498case arises out of a New Britain municipal election for aldermen at large. The petitioners, James Scheyd *499et al.,2 filed an action pursuant to § 9-328 to prevent the certification of the respondents, Peter J. Bezrucik et al.,3 as duly elected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ladd v. Douglas Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Comstock v. HempsteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Summit Hydropower Partnership v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Angelsea Productions, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.