Legal Opinion

Hatch v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1929No. Nos. 8447, 8448PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

In the court below the United States brought two suits in equity to recover, from former stockholder distributees of a dissolved corporation, additional income and profits taxes assessed against the corporation for the calendar years 1917, 1918, and 1919, in the respective amounts $1,216, $4,508.24, and $8,548.65, with interest. The first suit (No. 8447 here) involved the years 1917 and 1918; the second suit (No. 8448 here) involved the year 1919. The four stockholder distributees of the corporation, F. M. Hatch, H. H. Holmes, H. U. Carpenter, and James Yolin, were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hubbard-Ragsdale Co. v. DeanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1926
  2. Denver Live Stock Com'n Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Federal Surety Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Conklin-Zonne-Loomis Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. FEEDERS'SUPPLY CO. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. DoerksenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Cropper v. Titanium Pigment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Gantz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. Arthur Thomas Lelles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API