Legal Opinion

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Doerksen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1935No. 1049PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

On the first appeal of this case, 64 F.(2d) 240, we reserved the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, for the reason therein stated. It now becomes necessary to decide that question.

The policy provides for the double indemnity herein sued for if “the death of the insured resulted directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental cause. * * * This Double Indemnity will not apply if the Insured’s death resulted * * * from physical or mental infirmity; or directly or…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Hutchinson v. Fidelity Inv. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  5. Minnehaha County, SD v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API