Legal Opinion
United States v. 257.654 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided August 22, 1947No. Civ. 514, 521, 525, 527, 529, 532, 533, 535, 536, 540, 544, 548, 684PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, judge.
Prior to the institution by the United States, in exercise of its eminent domain powers, of these consolidated thirteen condemnation cases, the Honolulu Plantation Company operated adjacent to Pearl Harbor, upon the Island of Oahu, an irrigated 4,397.34-acre sugar plantation and also a refinery. Since its inception in 1899 this California corporation has conducted its business upon leased land, except for scattered parcels which by good fortune from time to time it has been able to buy in fee. Leasehold plantations, incidentally, are the rule rather than the exception in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Sands v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1960
- Hotel Coamo Springs, Inc. v. Hernandez ColonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976
- Daniels v. FarmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Stroh v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1969