Legal Opinion

Sands v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 18, 1960No. 4923, 4959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDBERG, Chief Judge.

This memorandum opinion relates to two separate actions consolidated for trial because of the identity of the parties involved and a similarity of issues. The first action, number 4923, was brought by Earl L. Sands and Rita D. Sands against the United States government and as amended by stipulation and pretrial order the plaintiffs seek damages in the amount of $9,999.99 for an alleged unlawful taking without just compensation. In the second action, number 4959, brought by the United States against Earl L. Sands and wife, James E. Comrada and wife, Frederic P. Holbrook,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. View Crest Garden Apts., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Kent (In re Professional Investment Properties of America)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Normandin v. Eastland Partners, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. National Data Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Bremerton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API