Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co. v. the Go Getter

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 22, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

Claiming that a new statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) (Forum non Conveniens), applies to admiralty, respondents obtained the transfer of these proceedings from Tacoma, Washington, and I have before me a motion to docket the case on the admiralty calendar.

Because of my own interest, I have made, some search of the authorities and, while the question may be regarded as close, I have concluded that 1404(a) was not intended to apply to admiralty. In this conclusion I find myself in disagreement with two Dis trict Judges, 1 who have held to the contrary. St. Paul Fire &…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. Orr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Petition of BackmanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  3. Hercules Company v. S/S AramisDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1964
  4. Texas Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  5. Kinsman Transit Co. v. Dunham Towing & Wrecking Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API