Legal Opinion

Allied Financial Services, Inc. v. Mangum

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 27, 1993No. 31350-9-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pekelis, A.C.J.

Derrell and Carol Mangum (the Man-gums) appeal the trial court's ruling which prohibited them *166from, calling witnesses at trial as a sanction for their failure to submit a witness list required by the pretrial discovery order.1 We affirm.

Allied brought an action against Derrell and Carol Man-gum claiming that they had breached a joint venture agreement. At the bench trial, the Mangums appeared pro se. The court ruled that the Mangums would not be allowed to call witnesses at trial because the Mangums had failed to submit a witness list as required by a pretrial discovery order.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 31641Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Henley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Goodman v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Dempere v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Woodhead v. Discount Waterbeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API