Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Kadinger

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1951No. 9249, 9250PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

These two cases involve the same question and were by stipulation consolidated for the purpose of appeal. The complaint in each action contains a charge that defendant had engaged in the business of contracting for plumbing work in the City of Sioux Falls without first having procured a license as required by ordinance. They contended that the ordinance is unconstitutional in that it violates Sections 1 and 2, Article VI, of the state Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution. Trial to the court without a jury resulted in convictions and each of the defendants was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. People v. . RingeNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Mundell v. GraphSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Berens v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Schroeder v. BinksIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Norwood v. ParenteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API