Legal Opinion

Smith v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 11, 1914No. 268PublishedCited by 96 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OP CRIMINAL APPEALS OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. The facts, which involve the constitutionality of the statute of Texas of 1909 prescribing qualifications for conductors on railroad trains, are stated in the opinion. The Texas statute deprives defendant, without due process of law, of liberty to engage in a lawful occupation for which he was shown to be well fitted and denies to him the equal protection of the laws.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE COURT OP CRIMINAL APPEALS OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. The facts, which involve the constitutionality of the statute of Texas of 1909 prescribing qualifications for conductors on railroad trains, are stated in the opinion. The Texas statute deprives defendant, without due process of law, of liberty to engage in a lawful occupation for which he was shown to be well fitted and denies to him the equal protection of the laws. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 369; Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 31; Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 U. S. 559; Lochner v. New York, 198 U. S. 53; Adair v.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamar

delivered tEe opinion of the court.

W. W. Smith, the plaintiff in error, a man 47 years of age, had spent 21 years in the railroad business. He had never been a brakeman or a conductor, but for six years he served as fireman, for three years ran as extra engineer on a freight train, for eight years was engineer on a mixed train, hauling freight and passengers, and for four years had been engineer on a passenger train of the Texas & Gulf Railway. On July 22, 1910, he acted as conductor of a freight train running between two Texas towns on that road. There is no claim in the brief for the State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. John E. Raper v. David J. LuceyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. People v. . CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API