Artonio v. Hirsch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action by an employee against Welbilt Corporation, Ms employer, and certain individuals who are officers, directors and stockholders of said corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in the course of his employment, the appeals are from two orders denying motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The complaint alleges, in substance, that respondent was injured as a result of the appellants’ willful, reckless and unlawful acts in locking, or tampering with, safety devices on a power press which' he operated. The motions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barrencotto v. Cocker Saw Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kuhn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- DeCoigne v. Ludlum Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Mazarredo v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Cifolo v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Maines v. Cronomer Valley Fire Dept., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Werner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rosales v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Houston v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.