Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J:

The appropriateness of the proceeding, to test by injunction the validity of the alleged illegal tax, is asserted in R. R. v. Commissioners, 188 N. C., 265, 124 S. E., 560.

There was some confusion in the law as it existed in 1929 as to whether the lien of State, county and municipal taxes attached annually *214on tbe first day of May, tbe date of listing, or on the first day of June. C. S., 2815 and 7987; Chemical Co. v. Brock, 198 N. C., 342; Shaffner v. Lipinsky, 194 N. C., 1, 138 S. E., 418; Carstarphen v. Plymouth, 186 N. C., 90, 118 S. E., 905. But however this may have been, it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bradley v. HollowaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  2. Carstarphen v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Mayor of Chattanooga v. RaulstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. R. R. v. . Comrs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Shaffner v. . LipinskySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Long v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. State v. Republic Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API