State v. Republic Steel Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
In the proceeding to enforce the personal property tax for the year 1934, in St. Louis, the defendants ansAvered. The cases were tried together, but separate findings of fact and conclusions of law were made sustaining the tax. Motions for new trial were made, and from the orders denying the same defendants appealed. In this court the cases were consolidated.
We deem “the following statement of facts enough to present the legal controversy: On May 1, 1934, the towns of Stuntz and Balkan were and had been duly organized townships. At the annual town meetings held March 13 of that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Mayor of Chattanooga v. RaulstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Hinson v. NickersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Green v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Johnston v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Saxhaug v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Township of Normania v. County of Yellow MedicineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- City of Wayzata v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Handevidt v. County of MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949