Legal Opinion

R. R. v. . Comrs.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to restrain the collection of an alleged unlawful tax and to correct and alleged error in the assessment of plaintiff's property for taxation.

From an order denying the relief sought, plaintiff appeals. In this jurisdiction, a taxpayer may contest the validity of an assessment or collection of tax upon his property in one of two ways:

1. He may pay the alleged illegal or invalid tax under protest and then bring an action to recover it back, observing, of course, the requirements of the statute with respect to time, notice, etc. C. S., 7979; Murdock v.Comrs., 138 N.C. 124; Hilliard…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seaman v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. Purnell v. Page.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Hilliard v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Wrought Iron Range Co. v. CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Sherrod v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hargett v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Barbee v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co. v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Hunt v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Austin v. . GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API