Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 27, 1993No. 01-92-01002-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEDGES, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Victor Maurice Jordan, guilty of two counts of aggravated robbery. The jury then assessed his punishment, enhanced by one prior felony conviction, at 99-years confinement and fined him $5,000.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief stating his opinion that the appeal is *420wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and advancing an arguable ground of error on appeal. Gainous v. State,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Giesberg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Lionell Dewayne West v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. Guzman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API