Legal Opinion

Mueller v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2006No. 93A02-0510-EX-931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-Plaintiff Amy Sue Mueller ("Amy"), as Surviving Spouse of Keith Michael Mueller ("Keith"), appeals from the denial by the Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana ("the Board") of her claim under the Worker's Compensation Act ("the Act"), alleging injuries arising out of and in the course of Keith's employment with Appellee-Defendant Daimler-Chrysler Corporation ("DaimlerChrysler"). We affirm.

Issue

Amy presents a single issue for review: whether Keith's fatal injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment with DaimlerChrysler.

Facts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milledge v. OaksIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Duvall v. ICI Americas, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Global Construction, Inc. v. MarchIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Clemans v. Wishard Memorial HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Shultz Timber v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wholesalers, Inc. v. HobsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Arnold v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Mayes v. Second Injury FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Rice Ex Rel. Lopez v. HarperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Earl Arnold, Sr. v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API