Legal Opinion

Shultz Timber v. Morrison

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2001No. 93A02-0012-EX-00839PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.

Defendant-Appellant, Schultz Timber (Schultz) appeals the award of the Work er's Compensation Board in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Harold Morrison (Morrison).

We affirm.

Schultz presents three issues which we restate as:

1. Whether Morrison satisfied his burden of proof establishing his entitlement to total permanent disability payments.

2. Whether, even if Morrison established his burden of proof, Schultz sue-cessfully rebutted Morrison's proof such that Morrison's claim should be denied.

3. Whether the Worker's Compensation Board made sufficiently specific findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development CenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. RoushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Steel Transport, Inc. v. HyattIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Triplett v. USX Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Van-Scyoc v. Mid-State PavingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Mueller v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Greenberg News Network v. FrederickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Wholesalers, Inc. v. HobsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API