Shultz Timber v. Morrison
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.
Defendant-Appellant, Schultz Timber (Schultz) appeals the award of the Work er's Compensation Board in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Harold Morrison (Morrison).
We affirm.
Schultz presents three issues which we restate as:
1. Whether Morrison satisfied his burden of proof establishing his entitlement to total permanent disability payments.
2. Whether, even if Morrison established his burden of proof, Schultz sue-cessfully rebutted Morrison's proof such that Morrison's claim should be denied.
3. Whether the Worker's Compensation Board made sufficiently specific findings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development CenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. RoushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Steel Transport, Inc. v. HyattIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by10 opinions
- Triplett v. USX Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Van-Scyoc v. Mid-State PavingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mueller v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Greenberg News Network v. FrederickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Wholesalers, Inc. v. HobsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.