Legal Opinion
Global Construction, Inc. v. March
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 2004No. 93S02-0401-EX-21PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
* While leaving the foundry where he was assigned by his employer Daniel March was injured by strikers. We hold that the Worker's Compensation Act covers this inJury. ‘
Factual and Procedural Background
Hobal Construction employed Daniel March to service machinery at various facilities of Global's customers. In September, 1999, March was performing maintenance at the Auburn Foundry, in Auburn where employees of the Foundry were on strike.
March completed his shift at the Foundry at approximately 10:30 p.m. on the night he was injured. Because a large number of picketing strikers…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development CenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Milledge v. OaksIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Wine-Settergren v. LameyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Prater v. Indiana Briquetting Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Reed v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DePuy, Inc. v. FarmerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Kehr Mid-West Iron v. BordnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mueller v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Burdette v. PERLMAN-ROCQUE CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hatke v. FiddlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.