Legal Opinion
Mayes v. Second Injury Fund
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 2007No. 93A02-0702-EX-162PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Appellant-petitioner Ronald Mayes appeals the Indiana Worker’s Compensation Board’s (the Board) denial of his petition for payment from Indiana’s Second Injury Fund 1 (the Second Injury Fund). Specifically, Mayes argues that the Board erred by denying him compensation from the-Second Injury Fund because he met the requirements for compensation and that his settlement with a third-party tortfeasor does not bar his recovery as a matter of law. Concluding that Mayes has failed to prove that he is entitled to compensation from the Second Injury Fund, we affirm the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- DePuy, Inc. v. FarmerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Calvary Temple Church, Inc. v. PainoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ansert Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. AnsertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Norris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mayes v. Second Injury FundIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- R.M. v. Second Injury FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011