Legal Opinion
Ruth v. Unifund CCR Partners
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 11, 2010No. 09-3426PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J., joined by Kennedy, J.,
MOORE, J. (pp. 914-15), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Pamela Ruth contends that the district court should not have dismissed her lawsuit against Unifund, its general partners and National Check Bureau on statute-of-limitations grounds. Because Ruth failed to comply with the one-year statute of limitations and because Unifund did not fraudulently conceal any information that prevented Ruth from filing her claim, we affirm.
I
Unifund is a general partnership specializing in debt collection. It conducts most of its business through its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu OyjCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Mary Edmondson v. Eagle National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Credit Suisse Securities (Usa) LLC v. SimmondsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Smith v. Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss, L.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Osure Brown v. Transworld Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.