Legal Opinion

Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu Oyj

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2012No. 07-6052, 07-6114PublishedCited by 254 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Carrier Corporation, Carrier SA, and Carrier Italia S.p.A. (collectively “Carrier”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims under the Sherman Act and the Tennessee Trade Practices Act for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Defendants-Appellees Outokumpu Oyj (“OTO”), Outokumpu Copper Products Oy (“OCP”), Outokumpu Copper (U.S.A.), Inc. (“Outokumpu U.S.A.”), and Outokumpu Copper Franklin, Inc. (“Outokumpu Franklin”) (collectively “Outokumpu”), and Mueller Industries, Inc. and Mueller…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by254 opinions

  1. SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Wayside Church v. Van Buren CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. MAG IAS Holdings v. Rainer Schm�ckleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Mary Edmondson v. Eagle National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API