Hamilton v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This matter comes on appeal from an order of the district court granting a preliminary injunction restraining the plaintiff from filing a notice of lis pendens against any real property of the defendants. (See the order of April 15, 1985.) Upon consideration of the arguments made in the briefs and the record, we affirm the district court’s judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Winkler v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Bramall v. WalesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherrill K. Duncan and Dora Mae Duncan v. Farm Credit Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Alien, Inc. v. FuttermanColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Thomas W. Hill v. Department of the Air Force Paul J. Vallerie, and Paul S. BrittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Bank of the W. v. WhitneyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2018
- Busch v. DoyleDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.